tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24103652.post5429445908072296390..comments2024-03-27T00:14:55.129-07:00Comments on Atwater Village Newbie: LA Times Commenter Would Split Atwater Village 3 WaysUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24103652.post-68773800857388806832009-03-13T14:03:00.000-07:002009-03-13T14:03:00.000-07:00Almost as fun as saying "Tropico," but Glendale ha...Almost as fun as saying "Tropico," but Glendale has a lock on that neighborhood name...AVNhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11204716776306117623noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24103652.post-8118299070712607682009-03-13T11:58:00.000-07:002009-03-13T11:58:00.000-07:00Sad that "Toonerville" has such a negative connect...Sad that "Toonerville" has such a negative connection. It's fun to say.Will Campbellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10613820435350540736noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24103652.post-23413009735809681712009-03-12T14:41:00.000-07:002009-03-12T14:41:00.000-07:00seems incredibly unnecessary. Atwater is so much ...seems incredibly unnecessary. Atwater is so much smaller geographically and numerically compared to so many other designated neighborhoods, I don't see the benefit to smaller designations. If there is some need, I'd ask then why the current distinctions of North, Central, and South Atwater are insufficient. They don't seem to be.katiesmurphyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12902632003229068272noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24103652.post-87284290703042142672009-03-12T14:34:00.000-07:002009-03-12T14:34:00.000-07:00At least I'd still be in Atwater. That said, it m...At least I'd still be in Atwater. That said, it makes no sense to break up one of the rare really defined geographic areas of the city. We're all Atwater.Mileshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11039669729545942514noreply@blogger.com